Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The point is that the later courses in CS curriculum depend much more on a good understanding of the imperative model and the issues that first arose in programming early Von Neumann computers, than they depend on understanding functional programming. Undergraduate algorithm classes are exclusively concerned with developing imperative algorithms. Large part of understanding operating systems is understanding how they handle memory management and that there is a need for it in the first place. Computer architecture and compiler courses are concerned with speeding up imperative programs. Even theory of computation courses spend more time exploring Von Neumann - like models than lambda calculus. You could redesign the whole curriculum of course, but then we don't happen to have computers that could more directly and efficiently execute functional programs, so I doubt this is a good idea.


Starting at one place in the stack does not prevent you from moving to other places for subsequent courses.


And you don't see value in the core sequence being more deeply interconnected?


I don't see your approach as necessarily "more deeply interconnected."




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: