Yes, clearly it's impossible for the actual event to have transpired differently than what the person said. No one ever exaggerates things or misrepresents them on the internet.
It's possible, likely even, but the extremely antagonistic way the article was written gives it pretty much zero credibility.
Especially with nitpicking like pointing out it was Port Authority police rather than NYPD - it was an irrelevant correction, as the point is he likely saw shields, and most people would have no clue about that kind of distinction and would simply assume NYPD, given that it is one of the best known police forces on the planet.
The Port Authority vs. the NYPD is not an irrelevant correction.
It's two completely different government enforcement agencies, with two completely different jobs, one of which is to actually care about what goes down at the airport.
The PA's presence isn't weird. The NYPD's would have been.
It's not like law enforcement agencies ever cooperated or gave tips to each other, or participated in joint activities. It's not like we just recently learned that NSA gives tips to DEA and IRS and then the latter lie to judges about where the info came from.
Right, because your stomach and head really care if they are hurting when you are held up in a room by Port Authority vs NYPD. They looked like police officers vs TSA officers.
The point remains that dissecting the blog on that level just reveals Fish for a piece of crap he is taking money to publish whatever they gave him.
