Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Well, it seems like simple test & conformance suites would have been enough to catch this, so you wouldn't need to run AS9100D quality inspections.

Besides it looks like the first AS9100 Standard was released after the incident even happened - perhaps even as a result of this.

So it's totally irrelevant that you both audit software in the space and know the Standard, no pun intended

 help



AS9100 is based off of ISO9001. It doesn't fucking matter, the responsibility is on both parties.

Again, tell me you don't actually handle quality without directly saying so.


yeah Mr. Quality supervisor



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: