I’m not sure how you can come to the conclusion that AI is an advocate for the individual writ large. It seems that AI can just as easily be used to make algorithmic decisions on who receives care (based on symptoms etc). Whether or not that’s an equalizing influence or not depends on the algorithm, training data, etc.
The models could be designed that way, but we don't have evidence that they have been designed that way today. If that were to occur in future, I'm sure people would seek out impartial models.
