Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

You are being irrational, it is extremely easy to compare supermarket prices from 2003 to prices on 2012.


Yes, of course, but that doesnt prove anything about INDEC. The index does not measure the changes in that way. Please, dont call me "irrational", it clearly doesnt apply, I think that I have a reasonable argument that of course can be wrong, but by any means is irrational. Please tellme how do you go from this premise: "The prices in the supermarket raised" to "Indec is a lier". My argument is that it cant be "Because yogurth increased 300% and Indec inflation report is 10%". We need something better to prove they are wrong (and let me repeat again that I think they are wrong)


Sorry Roderik, I am beginning to think that you are part of a new Turing test.


Well, you keep talking about me instead about the topic,and I dont understand why you are disrespectful with my person. I will go back to reading on Logic, mi topic for this week. I got "Metalogic" from Hunter. Really, sorry for the noise.


lol, I'm with you on this one wslh.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: