Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | denverllc's commentslogin

Some people thought that surgical masks wouldn’t stop you from getting Covid


Surgical masks don't stop you from getting Covid. That was never what they were for: they were to reduce the viral load you exposed others to, between when you got infected and when you noticed that you were infected. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surgical_mask#Function.

Some cloth masks can (when dry) also trap small particulates through electrostatic interactions, although they are less effective as a mechanical filter than surgical masks; and many washing methods destroy this effect.


Right, but that still makes the people who refused to wear one selfish assholes.


They didn't. The point is that they stop you from giving covid to other people.


It's a distinction without a difference. Masks served to reduce the herd from spreading covid. Including other people giving it to you.


The distinction is important! The mechanism by which surgical masks prevent you from getting COVID-19 is peer pressure: it's important for people to know this, so they know how to protect themselves. (And there are fitted masks that protect the wearer: there was just a shortage of them, because despite all the warnings we were not prepared for a pandemic.)


The distinction does matter, because by not wearing a mask, instead of indicating that you don't care about your own safety, you're indicating that you don't care about anybody else's.


You do realise that surgeons don't wear those masks to stop them from catching something right?


> Some people thought that surgical masks wouldn’t stop you from getting Covid

You do realize that masks would help prevent you from getting covid if other people are wearing the masks, right?

The comment just talked about masks, not whether you are the one wearing the mask.


It was more nuanced than that and importantly, "Anti-masker" as a derogatory statement was about "This person is literally unwilling to do anything at all that doesn't pay off for them personally" because a goddamn mask is such a simple thing to do, and they just couldn't handle it, because it was someone else telling them to do something and some people just cannot function when that happens.

People lost their damn minds because "Hey could you maybe take a single small step to ensure you don't sneeze on produce" was protest worthy.

I do not believe someone saying "Masks made out of T-Shirts don't work well" or "Surgical masks aren't as effective as real N95 masks" are an "Anti-masker".

It was about vice-signalling. All the people who get pissy about masks do plenty of things for their "health" that have zero science behind them.

These people often did other things like hiding or downplaying any symptoms, and choosing to go to events while sick, and were often basically superspreaders.

This was all well understood like 25 years ago when WoW did that blood plague thing and people put effort into spreading it as much as possible. We've seen this with other diseases including ones that have no real controversy or political angle. Some people are just that insistent about doing everything they can to make the world a worse place.

It just sucks so much.


Do they? Are they different than OpenAi which I know has lots of debt and is losing money quarter over quarter with declining user share.


Open article and Ctrl+F “APOE”: No result

A lot of interventions o work differently based on APOE 4 status, so difficult to know whether this study will apply generally.


A lack of capitals gives me sama vibes and I don’t trust sama


Sure they mention diet and exercise in the same way gambling or alcohol ads recommend being “responsible”, or how TikTok talks about their automatic screen limiting time functionality, which they love to promote but internally know does nothing.


I’m not sure where the goalposts are in this discussion. My doctor assigned me a dietitian. My insurance company assigned me 12 weekly modules that cover diet, exercise, mental health and cooking before they would pay for it. The ads I see on the subway for Ro have the words “with diet and exercise” in bold letters on them.

So I just don’t know what to make of this “magic beans” deception claim.

It’s starting to feel like a certain group of people, for reasons I can’t discern, are desperate for some kind of “gotcha.”


Given soda ph around 2.5, temperature 25C, phosphoric acid 0.05% and sucrose 10% gives a half life around 4 years. Or only 7% over 6 months.


Will apps built with this framework be compatible with accessibility features?


No. Iced has no accessibility support built in. It's a pretty hard thing to do, so it's not surprising that something more hobby driven doesn't have it.


I hope that System76 invest into adding accessibility support into Iced, because they are using it to build Cosmic (the official desktop environment for Pop_OS).


They've committed to adding accessibility features. Iirc COSMIC right now has screen reader, magnification, and high contrast/invert colors support.

There is a really long way to go though, and accessibility on mobile comes with its own challenges as well. It will take a long time.


> it would've been considered cheating when they were in school.

Doubt. What field of study?

The predominant calculation helper was slide rules, which were allowed in engineering exams in the 60s and 70s.

Besides, in engineering you had to show all of your work and that had a large impact on the grade you got.


I said high school.


> they believe in some big pharma conspiracy

See: the Sackler family


Also pfizergate featuring von der leyen.


They main purpose of active desktop was to claim IE was an inextricable part of windows


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: